Too many gadgets in new vehicles?

Dellortoman

Hero member
Mr Sock posted a joke (in the "This week's joke" thread) about too many gadgets in new cars. That's a subject I've been thinking about a bit lately and I don't like the way it's going in new cars. Rather than post a non jocular response in the joke thread, I figured I'd start a new thread because I'm interested in what people think of so-called "driver aids" in both cars and motorcycles.

Personally, I dislike pretty much all of the smart gadgets in cars from benign things like automatic windscreen wipers and headlights, to intrusive things that actually take over control of the vehicle like lane assist. That's one of the reasons I drive an older car and probably won't update it in the time I have left in my life as a driver.

My car (Mitsubishi Delica) doesn't have anything resembling driver aids. It doesn't even have automatic transmission. It only has stuff like chimes that "ping ping" or squeal if I leave the key in the ignition switch or the headlights on when I open the door. They're annoying enough but not so much that I've gone to the trouble of disabling them. One automatic function I have modified is the control of the glow plugs. They're needed for cold starting, but the inbuilt timer kept them on for way too long, like 10 minutes or so until the engine warms up. That's way too long and it was regularly burning out plugs. I was replacing one or more glow plugs every couple of months. You can switch them off immediately after the engine has started and it'll keep running just fine. So I wired in a beeper to tell me when they're on and a manual override to switch them off. That was about 5 years ago and I haven't had a burned out plug since.

My car doesn't even have ABS, but I know how to control an emergency stop all by myself. I also drive defensively enough that situations where I need to do a panic stop are vanishingly rare.

I keep my car well maintained so it's as safe as it can be for myself, my passengers and other road users. I haven't had so much as a fender bender in about 30 years so I consider myself a reasonably safe driver without fancy driver aids. Incidentally, I think motorcyclists make much safer car drivers than non motorcyclists because they maintain much better awareness of what's going on around them than the average car driver. A motorcyclist who isn't in the habit of being hyper-aware isn't going to live very long.

I don't need lane assist or automatic braking because I pay attention and look where I'm going. If I get tired and my concentration suffers, I'll take a break.

One of the reasons I got rid of my 2010 Ducati Multistrada was that it was making too many decisions for me that I didn't want it to make, and in some cases was unaware of until it became an unwelcome intrusion into my riding experience.

I came across this video by D4A the other day that is relevant to the "too many gadgets in new cars" theme. He has an interesting take on the subject. He reckons it's the thin end of the wedge to take away the ability for humans to control their own lives. I quite like his videos because he seems to be an intelligent guy, a good communicator, and he researches his subjects well.

 
Back when an automatic gearbox allowed people who couldn't master clutch control, to drive, anyone passing their Driving Test in an automatic was restricted to driving automatics only.
There were two aspects of the Test which instilled terror in the unskilled drivers: the "hill start" requiring coordination of throttle, clutch and handbrake, and the "three point turn", requiring correct use of the steering wheel and situational awareness in both forward and reverse gear.
Now, almost all modern cars have a brake hold facility, yet Test passers are licenced to drive a car with a handbrake.
Worse still, with the addition of parking radar/reversing cameras, people (I will not call them 'drivers') now turn in the road anywhere that takes their fancy: over the brow of hills, in the middle of bends, etc. I've even seen people do it on the entry to roundabouts, FFS!
These "safety aids" are massively increasing risks to all those outside the vehicle and, consequently, fostering selfishness in these skill-free, more-passenger-than-drivers.
 
I did my driving test in a Beetle with a manual gearbox, and the reverse park and 3-point turn were done on the steepest street in Nutal Bay. If I hadn't taken a few professional lessons on that same street, there would be zero chance of passing that test 52 years ago.
 
My wife has a 2019 Subaru Outback. It is the top of the line touring model model with every option available including the six cylinder motor

After six years of driving it we both still don't know what a lot of the buttons on the dash actually do? It has the electric parking brake which I don't like as how do you stop the car with no electrical power? On occasion when driving the car it will make a beep sound and show something on the display and we have no idea what it is trying to tell us.

The only electronic option I like is the automatic cruise control. It will follow the car in front of you and apply the brake or throttle as needed. It makes being stuck in traffic much nicer as you don't have to do anything.

I have a 1929 AJS motorcycle. No electrics other than the magneto. No dynamo, battery or wire harness on the bike. Lights are acetylene and it has a hand shift for the gearbox. The valves and lifters run outside the motor and the primary and clutch are also all open to the weather. It is very easy to work on if something goes wrong. The cylinder head can be removed in about five minutes as you don't even need to take off the fuel tank. The only modern feature on this bike is that 1929 is the first year with an automatic oil pump.
 
Yes adaptive cruise control is the only thing I use in the new hire cars I am given. All the rest is just a pain and as for touch screens, they should be banned. My own car has none of the modern 'driver aids' and is all the better for it.
 
The question is if you can embrace the change and enjoy the new features or if you think you give away controle. In between this, most of them can be disabled or even need to be enabled to use them.

If you ever tried an emergency stop in a fast driven corner on a wett road, you appreciate ABS.

If you ever lost attention in a traffic jam (like I did) and bumped into the car in front of you, you enjoy distance controle

If you ever went long distance traveling, line and (adaptive) cruise controle come quite handy

if you ever experienced summers with 40+°C, you simply love air condition

if you ever had a winter with tons of snow over night and a frozen car, you enjoy remote controled pre-heating of your car

if you ever had a puncture that slowly lowered the pressure in your tire, you maybe would have enjoyed an intime warning

If you ever went into a foreign town, had to leave your car in a spot that you can not remember to find again, you just love that you can see on your mobile where it is and how to get there.

I could go on like that, but I think you get the point. And wouldn'd we all have wished at least once in a life time that our old cloncers had a diagnose port to just read out what the sucker's problem is again?

I enjoy modern technology. Does it come with risks of giving away personal data? Most likely. But are you on the internet in Facebook, Instagram or the likes? Your car is your least problem, believe me...

Or let's make it more abstract: If you do go on a sightseeing tour in a new town and because of the beauty of the town, you get distracted and don't pay attention enough to the traffic, walking onto the street etc - would you critizize the person that holds you back before the bus hits you or would you thank him for saving your live?

Most of these systems are ASSISTANCES, they shell help you and compensate for your lack of attention or missbehaviour. The number of fatal accidents have lowered ever since these systems have been introduced while the number of cars and traffic overall (and it's complexity) has dramatically increased. how is that if there isn't any good in these systems... ;)
 
Last edited:
My wife has a 2019 Subaru Outback. It is the top of the line touring model model with every option available including the six cylinder motor

After six years of driving it we both still don't know what a lot of the buttons on the dash actually do? It has the electric parking brake which I don't like as how do you stop the car with no electrical power? On occasion when driving the car it will make a beep sound and show something on the display and we have no idea what it is trying to tell us.

The only electronic option I like is the automatic cruise control. It will follow the car in front of you and apply the brake or throttle as needed. It makes being stuck in traffic much nicer as you don't have to do anything.

I have a 1929 AJS motorcycle. No electrics other than the magneto. No dynamo, battery or wire harness on the bike. Lights are acetylene and it has a hand shift for the gearbox. The valves and lifters run outside the motor and the primary and clutch are also all open to the weather. It is very easy to work on if something goes wrong. The cylinder head can be removed in about five minutes as you don't even need to take off the fuel tank. The only modern feature on this bike is that 1929 is the first year with an automatic oil pump.
Automatic oil pump! Luxury!
 
The question is if you can embrace the change and enjoy the new features or if you think you give away controle. In between this, most of them can be disabled or even need to be enabled to use them.

If you ever tried an emergency stop in a fast driven corner on a wett road, you appreciate ABS.

If you ever lost attention in a traffic jam (like I did) and bumped into the car in front of you, you enjoy distance controle

If you ever went long distance traveling, line and (adaptive) cruise controle come quite handy

if you ever experienced summers with 40+°C, you simply love air condition

if you ever had a winter with tons of snow over night and a frozen car, you enjoy remote controled pre-heating of your car

if you ever had a puncture that slowly lowered the pressure in your tire, you maybe would have enjoyed an intime warning

If you ever went into a foreign town, had to leave your car in a spot that you can not remember to find again, you just love that you can see on your mobile where it is and how to get there.

I could go on like that, but I think you get the point. And wouldn'd we all have wished at least once in a life time that our old cloncers had a diagnose port to just read out what the sucker's problem is again?

I enjoy modern technology. Does it come with risks of giving away personal data? Most likely. But are you on the internet in Facebook, Instagram or the likes? Your car is your least problem, believe me...
Until your airbag fuse blows at Gatwick airport drop off point rendering car imobile or your flat battery on your Range Rover causes your handbrake to stick on, your electric window winder cables snap and window disappears into the door, or your car develops a fault that the garage can’t fix other than “ buy a new car”. I was trained on BMW moditec plug in diagnosis- never found a real fault but wrongly diagnosed dozens. All gadgets a great when they work..until they don’t. Apparently, lots of BMW ( motorcycle) ABS sealed units are unobtainable now, perfectly good bike that cannot be fixed . Lots of parking/ warning gadgets are making people button pushing plebs and not responsible drivers- your supposed to be awake and aware- if you need an alarm clock your too old.
I was talking to some riders of “adventure bikes” apparently you can alter the rider mode/ traction control setting for when it rains in Milton Keynes- they probably think being daring is an eating after eights at half seven!
People whining the Satvav took them the wrong way, google maps is wrong- my wife moaned that her car didn’t have air con and they boiled driving through Spain & France…until I showed her the button with AC written on it..
 
Mr Sock posted a joke (in the "This week's joke" thread) about too many gadgets in new cars. That's a subject I've been thinking about a bit lately and I don't like the way it's going in new cars. Rather than post a non jocular response in the joke thread, I figured I'd start a new thread because I'm interested in what people think of so-called "driver aids" in both cars and motorcycles.

Personally, I dislike pretty much all of the smart gadgets in cars from benign things like automatic windscreen wipers and headlights, to intrusive things that actually take over control of the vehicle like lane assist. That's one of the reasons I drive an older car and probably won't update it in the time I have left in my life as a driver.

My car (Mitsubishi Delica) doesn't have anything resembling driver aids. It doesn't even have automatic transmission. It only has stuff like chimes that "ping ping" or squeal if I leave the key in the ignition switch or the headlights on when I open the door. They're annoying enough but not so much that I've gone to the trouble of disabling them. One automatic function I have modified is the control of the glow plugs. They're needed for cold starting, but the inbuilt timer kept them on for way too long, like 10 minutes or so until the engine warms up. That's way too long and it was regularly burning out plugs. I was replacing one or more glow plugs every couple of months. You can switch them off immediately after the engine has started and it'll keep running just fine. So I wired in a beeper to tell me when they're on and a manual override to switch them off. That was about 5 years ago and I haven't had a burned out plug since.

My car doesn't even have ABS, but I know how to control an emergency stop all by myself. I also drive defensively enough that situations where I need to do a panic stop are vanishingly rare.

I keep my car well maintained so it's as safe as it can be for myself, my passengers and other road users. I haven't had so much as a fender bender in about 30 years so I consider myself a reasonably safe driver without fancy driver aids. Incidentally, I think motorcyclists make much safer car drivers than non motorcyclists because they maintain much better awareness of what's going on around them than the average car driver. A motorcyclist who isn't in the habit of being hyper-aware isn't going to live very long.

I don't need lane assist or automatic braking because I pay attention and look where I'm going. If I get tired and my concentration suffers, I'll take a break.

One of the reasons I got rid of my 2010 Ducati Multistrada was that it was making too many decisions for me that I didn't want it to make, and in some cases was unaware of until it became an unwelcome intrusion into my riding experience.

I came across this video by D4A the other day that is relevant to the "too many gadgets in new cars" theme. He has an interesting take on the subject. He reckons it's the thin end of the wedge to take away the ability for humans to control their own lives. I quite like his videos because he seems to be an intelligent guy, a good communicator, and he researches his subjects well.

The chap in the video has a rare balance of left and right brain thinking. Our society typically rewards left brain thinking "bean counters" whilst "head in the clouds" big picture thinkers find it more difficult to find suitable paid uses for their natural aptitude. Left brain thinking is the predominant mode in our modern world.

The first half of his video is very analytical left brain stuff and gives no inclination of what is coming in the second half of the video! But it's good and I think his big picture musings are right on the mark. I'd go further with a deeper discussion about who "they" are who are implementing this clearly emerging control grid ...but not here... this is where I come to get away from "they" and enjoy the disappearing analogue world that is now increasingly in the rear view mirror. But thank you Dellortoman for introducing me to a very interesting character as I typically don't watch car orientated channels, so I would never have come across him.
 
Most of these systems are ASSISTANCES, they shell help you and compensate for your lack of attention or missbehaviour.
The driver should, at all times, be responsible for the conduct of their vehicle.
They are, after all, criminally responsible for it.
If a "driver aid" fails and death, injury or damage is caused, who are you going to blame, the "driver" or the vehicle?
 
Modern electronics in cars should be restricted to control of traction under power and brakes, nothing more. Automatic wipers and headlights aren't intrusive. Stuff like this lane departure crap, where the steering wheel vibrates like crazy when you take a natural line through an apex, are a mindfuk. Like the rest of it, it's just intrusion and it has created lots of really poor and undereducated drivers ... which is why the massive crackdown on 'speeding' is all-pervasive.
 
Not enough driver awareness i'd say.
Yesterday while taking a break at Keele services, M6 south bound, coming back from Scotland. A hired transit van parked next to our campervan. Nothing unusual about that. Lorry Carpark area had a gentle uphill gradient ( almost empty as it was a Sunday)
I sat on the side door step having a quick brew. Said Hi to the driver, but got no reply. He had Already glued his vision to his smart phone !!!
Off he went to the services facilities.
" His hire van".....!!!! Started to gently roll back. No time for me to do anything but shout very loud to him to run back.
Took two loud shouts to get him to look back, smartphone now glued to his ear!!!!
By this time the van was heading, with some speed, backwards towards "the live" southbound carriageway!!! About 150m away.
The steering lock had luckily for everyone, not locked at straight ahead .
The van gained speed and slightly turned away from the slipway of the live motor way.
The van ploughed backwards into a Polish lorry, with the driver asleep in his cab. A little bit of a shock for him to wake up too.
A trained driver ( always parks with handbrake ON, in Gear and steering facing the road side )
A distracted driver "holding" a piece of modern technology etc etc
 
The driver should, at all times, be responsible for the conduct of their vehicle.
They are, after all, criminally responsible for it.
If a "driver aid" fails and death, injury or damage is caused, who are you going to blame, the "driver" or the vehicle?
Checkout the new Highway Code - a driver is not responsible for how correctly functioning self driving car behaves but must take over when prompted to do so..
Let’s hope you haven’t dozed off by then .
 
I honestly think every driver should have to prove they can change a wheel, top up fluids, tyre pressures and cars should be made so you can change a bulb without tools. I would also reintroduce words like Shooting Brake & double de- clutch, dress code driving jacket ( with web backed gloves and a cap if deemed appropriate) anti static rubber dangly arrows and five star petrol. The AA should reintroduce saluting and sidecars…perhaps then they would arrive in 45 minutes instead of later this week or subbing it out to some cowboy recovery outfit in Wales that “ didn’t realise it was a bike, boyo”
 
I honestly think every driver should have to prove they can change a wheel, top up fluids, tyre pressures and cars should be made so you can change a bulb without tools. I would also reintroduce words like Shooting Brake & double de- clutch, dress code driving jacket ( with web backed gloves and a cap if deemed appropriate) anti static rubber dangly arrows and five star petrol. The AA should reintroduce saluting and sidecars…perhaps then they would arrive in 45 minutes instead of later this week or subbing it out to some cowboy recovery outfit in Wales that “ didn’t realise it was a bike, boyo”
Not that you feel strongly about it or anything like that! :ROFLMAO: (Greetings from Wales) ;)
 
Back
Top