The LB125 and the Lezmo was Laverda's own engine, but (of course) they may have "borrowed" from other makers where the design is concerned, some have said Husquvarna, but does anyone realy know? for sure they are not Zundapp engines, made by Zundapp,As in the LZ125 and LZ175, which were very rugged, long lasting reliable,and Laverda's best ever seller at something like 30,000 units! but again, maybe design parameters are within.I cant say why they fail early, it does not look like lubrication, but more like lean running, which Jody avoided by getting his dyno tuned at a two stroke specialist (BDK) with great care being taken to ensure stabilisation at constant throttle opening right across the twistgrips movement, as well as crusing and snap it wide,......but
I have seen in side the Chott (totally different motor, but still Laverda's own) and the problem with crankshaft and piston failure (in the Chott) is (IMHO) caused by the lack of a lubrication drain to one of the main bearings, one of them has the normal small puddle effect above the casting for the bearing with a drain hole to within, but the other has nothing, so it relies on mist, so there is there is only 50% of bearing fling, this (I think) is why the Chott fails.The 2TR seems to go on for a fair bit longer, and I have never seen inside one, so maybe this was changed? for the Lezmo, I would suspect the same might be the case, but I never owned one, so I never got have a realy good, in detail look.Piston failure on a two stroke can easilly be caused by a lack of lubrication, making the piston loook as if its been run too week, because the lube also does a lot of the cooling.
I would realy like a close look at an open 2TR if anyone is doing that, 2TR that is not Chott, the 2TR has only a single compression ring, whereas the Chott has two of the same, , also different ports, between the two, with the more radical ones in the more reliable engine, work that one out Steve B !!
CLEM