This has been around for a while but might be interesting:
If it's for a 180 then I feel it should really be a 3-2-1 with the two outer exhausts joining first before combining with the centre. Like a 4-2-1 but missing one of the centre cylinders.
cheers
bazzee
Probably cheaper to buy a modern bike if ya wanna go fast faster.
3-2-1 is what the SR-Racing Design looks like...This has been around for a while but might be interesting:
If it's for a 180 then I feel it should really be a 3-2-1 with the two outer exhausts joining first before combining with the centre. Like a 4-2-1 but missing one of the centre cylinders.
cheers
bazzee
The problem is cylinders 1 and 3 , assuming everything is identical between the two , they are both trying to expel their exhaust gases at the same time.
! and 3 fire at the same time.Why would they do that? Why wouldn't they just expel their gasses on their own exhaust stroke?
Jim
The plugs do but gases in the cylinders don't.! and 3 fire at the same time.
Do you mean FAST faster ..... or fast FASTER?
Big difference ........... mostly in the capitalization.
FAST FASTER .... that is all in capitalisation.
no they don't, engine fires 3, 2, 1, miss, 3, 2, 1, miss, etc! and 3 fire at the same time.
That would be VERY odd, Kermit (big bang motor gone wrong!). If it was a two-stroke, you'd be right, but on a 180 it would be 700-ish cc firing on one stroke and a 300-ish cc 180 degrees later!!! and 3 fire at the same time.
I stand correctedno they don't, engine fires 3, 2, 1, miss, 3, 2, 1, miss, etc