750 engine block breather

ludiluka

Senior member
Hi there

there is one on the top of the engine on valve covers. And on some bikes i see another on the rear left side  of the engine there is flat spot left on engine block. Was it factory??
 
No.
The breather on top of the head is sufficient, however SF2 and SF3 had a larger diameter breather than those before. Pretty certain the SFC had only that too, but the boffins can set you straight there. On some big bore engine racebikes that people have made they have added another breather to the cases, using the dipstick or similar.
 
Additional breathers were certainly experimented with, old photos show a pipe connected to where the dipstick is fitted.

On my long-stoke GTL, I have also fitted an additional breather to the dipstick hole.  Comprises of a small chamber containing a RGS-type breather baffle with a hose leading to Nirvana, works a treat.  Engine definitely spins a little quicker/more freely, but have not noticed any differences on stock dimension engines.

The flat raised casting at the rear of the cases has the same shape and size as the cover for the neutral switch.  Perhaps it is a left-over from the experimental/developement stage, just like the 2 unused bosses at the top of the gearbox casing.  Or maybe they were retained for future use, who knows?

piet

 
Hi Luka - on my racing twins I add another breather over the gearbox - I run the triple breather hose with a Morini 3? breather baffle in it. - Regards - Phil
 

Attachments

  • 750 breather.jpg
    750 breather.jpg
    149.6 KB · Views: 54
750-breather.gif
 

this is the spot
 
Not seen a factory breather where you say - looked at 3 engines and see the crankcases are fairly flat in the area of the two small raised circular protrusions - Regards - Phil
 
I always thought it was a boss for a (not implemented) crossover linkage?  I never heard it referred to as a possible breather, it seems in a stupid position for one - not easy to get a large diameter tube either into the case or out past the frame. 
But it would be interesting to know for sure what the intention was, perhaps a practical joke by the pattern maker after a liquid lunch?
 
Pretty sure they initially planned a (or the) breather there, since in that spot there is an open connection with the inside of the engine, whereas on the R/H side this is not the case.

Marnix
 
I think you are right Marnix,  it actually seems a sensible place to put one as it should be masked quite well from splashing etc,  Not sure of the clearance for fitting tubes behind it though as I don't have a built up bike to look at.

Regards,
Julian
 
Once Laverda decided to go for the low air pression inside the crankcase by using the rubber ball construction, they needed to have the breather in a vertical position.

Until 1974, virtually all the SFC factory racers had a second breather on the dipstick hole, and they all had the rubber ball inside, so that breather needed to be in vertical position too.

I think this is why they never used the breather at the upper left rear of the crankcase.

Marnix
 
The ball type breather works well - but the ball can get contaminated and swell up to block the breather with some nasty consequences. For racing I prefer the Morini 3? type that fits in the breather hose - the later RG series used a  mini version of this type too. - Regards - Phil
 

Attachments

  • Morini baffle.jpg
    Morini baffle.jpg
    157.8 KB · Views: 27
If you're serious about pumping the cases down to below atmospheric pressure, use a proper reed valve.

I've been putting yamaha DT/RD four petal reed valves on singles and 360deg twins for years. Even solved the Britten's oiling problems with one.It's easy enough to fabricate a box to hold the assembly, short large dia hose to the cases and tuck it away out of sight.
 
Back
Top