mauricejota7604
Hero member
- Location
- Victoria Australia
If your sleeves are not damaged and not leaking I would suggest leaving them,but have a look around the clamping area of the carb body as over tightening has a tendency to crack the castings.
angonemoto said:Thanks for the tip on the sleeves and castings.
Timing check complete, we verified a few things with the valve cover off.
Cam timing is approximately set at intake 104 exhaust 113 off of the outbound (Cylinder #3) cam lobes, per Phil Todd's recommendation. We did notice several of the followers seem shimmed pretty tight, as they wouldn't spin by hand. The plan is to recheck after some more miles on the road and determine next steps. The new cam blocks were an "Oh thats right, I did opt for those, didn't I?" moment. Really nice looking setup. I'm glad they're in there. Hats off to Scott Potter, who prepared this motor, for making me aware of this option. Really pretty stuff.
angonemoto said:The new cam blocks were an "Oh thats right, I did opt for those, didn't I?" moment. Really nice looking setup. I'm glad they're in there. Hats off to Scott Potter, who prepared this motor, for making me aware of this option. Really pretty stuff.
angonemoto said:[...]We did notice several of the followers seem shimmed pretty tight, as they wouldn't spin by hand. The plan is to recheck after some more miles on the road and determine next steps. [...]
Valve clearance to tight or cam followers with bathtub wear pattern? Neither of them is recommendable for extended use, especially not on open throttle/high loads, at least if you aren't keen on the engine swallowing one of it's valves.![]()
angonemoto said:Now that I understand from Red that the cam blocks have lifted the exhaust cams up on that side of the assembly. That wont affect the way I should check the clearance at each lobe bottom to each follower/bucket/tappet, but I wonder why these would be installed in the first place? Could it be the exhaust valve seats within the head have been worked on and are now set in deeper into the head, and raising this cam allows "thicker" shims with a wider size range to continue to be used over time rather than "thinner" ones?
Even more confusing to me is the exhaust blocks are marked 0.2 and the intake are marked 0.0, which has me thinking the cam shafts are no longer parallel to each other. which shouldnt be a big deal considering the shims will "even things out" when they are set up correctly.
angonemoto said:I'm especially thankful for the note "Lifting the cam by 0.20mm results in a shim thickness increase of ~0.26mm", which will be helpful for predicting the size of shims to buy, fit and check. I will post the shim sizes that are in there for sure.
Thanks!
angonemoto said:Great information, thanks again.
I was fine leaving the timing set as is prior to this shim situation, but now I think the opportunity to bring those settings closer in to standard is not to be missed. Afterall, I'm not qualified to go exploring the outer reaches of timing and tuning. The 101/103 compromise feels right, so Maurice, what size main jets are you running with your 101 inlet 103 exhaust timing? I'll order them while I go in and figure out what shims I have.
Now that I understand from Red that the cam blocks have lifted the exhaust cams up on that side of the assembly. That wont affect the way I should check the clearance at each lobe bottom to each follower/bucket/tappet, but I wonder why these would be installed in the first place? Could it be the exhaust valve seats within the head have been worked on and are now set in deeper into the head, and raising this cam allows "thicker" shims with a wider size range to continue to be used over time rather than "thinner" ones?
In 77 Jota the jets are 125 main and 58 pilot
Even more confusing to me is the exhaust blocks are marked 0.2 and the intake are marked 0.0, which has me thinking the cam shafts are no longer parallel to each other. which shouldnt be a big deal considering the shims will "even things out" when they are set up correctly.
As far as cam block torque, I realize that's going to be a critical part of getting this all shimmed correctly alongside the risk of damaging the head. FML. Since published values are known to be inaccurate, any thoughts on safe technique and torque ranges for these studs?
Lastly, IAG Bob Colbert just sent some photos of the process of removing the shims for replacement. I am going to post them here for reference as they have helped me visualize this process specifically to our triple motors, which is a great help. Thanks again Bob!
Camshafts removed and cam chain secured to frame to avoid falling off bottom wheel teeth.
![]()
Bucket/tappet/follower removed revealing shim on valve assembly.
![]()
Shim removed showing valve assembly only.
![]()
Removed bucket from underneath and shim for reference.
![]()