rocketonarail
Hero member
- Location
- Gloucestershire,England
Karl or Paul ?It boils down to what Marx said: Best to learn - and do your own - proper wrenching if you want to own any bike more than 25 years old.
I guess now that modern motorcycles are leisure vehicles (or at least tend to be viewed as such ) , owners now leave servicing to their local dealer , it`s not as if you have to work on your machine now to ensure it gets you to work on a Monday morning , after all , that`s what the car is for .
People seem more inclined to modify their machines , de-cat , ECU flash , or whatever it is they do nowadays to feel they`ve "improved" their bike , but that1`s about as far as it goes.
Modern goods nowadays , whatever they are , are expected to work at maximum efficiency with minimum input from the operator , so old(er) motorcycles don`t fit in with this mindset , only new ones .
Working on bikes for a lot of people in the not so distant past seemed to be no more than removing perfectly designed and functioning items and replacing them with tasteless useless catalogue tat...
As for retro versus real , back in the mid - nineties , when the whole retro thing was just starting off , a Laverda owner wrote (It was that long ago) to Motorcycle Sport saying the Laverda wasn`t really for him , as he decided he wasn`t into "retro " bikes......
He seemed to think that anything old was "retro" , not grasping the fact that retro was brand new , with all the modern equipment , but just styled with a nod to a bygone time .
You may as well dig out a "retro" AJS Big Port , or Royal Enfield Crusader Sport .
That bloke`s letter is still annoying me all these years later...
Last edited: