1200ts
Hero member
- Location
- USA - Riverside CA
I have not seen any news as of late about the four valve triple head. Has any one actually bought one and has a bike running with it? If so what kind of power does it make?
running in BEARs we can do anything we like to the engine, frame, wheels, brakes, suspension, etcQuestion.
Has anyone seen any flow numbers, is there any port size, valve size data?
Would Red's racing class allow the 4 valve head?
It looks a nice bit of work and would be fun to use in a class where it's allowed.
Regards,
J
Because someone at the factory was clever enough to realise they needed a new bottom end before doing a better top end.Always wondered why Laverda didn't breath more life into the triple with 3 or 4 valve heads![]()
They didn't even have enough money left to pay the cleaning lady, and that after selling off the agricultural machine branch.Always wondered why Laverda didn't breath more life into the triple with 3 or 4 valve heads![]()
there is a good interview with Massimo Laverda from 1983 or so on the downfall of Laverda. It covers some points related to that questionAlways wondered why Laverda didn't breath more life into the triple with 3 or 4 valve heads![]()
Because increasingly stringent emmissions regulations world-wide caught up with them. The Mk II triple in 120° guise was truely the end of the road, only a very major re-design could have kept it going. The air-cooled concept doesn't lend itself to much more RELIABLE power for general bike-buying numpties (most of whom weren't able or willing to adhere to oil change or service intervals), major manufacturers failed with air-cooled 4-valvers or quickly switched to liquid-cooling to extract more power to satisfy the ever hungry public.Always wondered why Laverda didn't breath more life into the triple with 3 or 4 valve heads![]()
Family problems.I guess logic and passion might have been mutually exclusive here. Upgrading existing designs have worked for many (BMW, Ducati etc) to retain brand loyalty. All ifs, buts and maybes now and too much money spent chasing lucrative government contracts and unproven designs.
yep, been my focus all the time we have been racing, trying to make the bottom end and gearbox surviveBecause someone at the factory was clever enough to realise they needed a new bottom end before doing a better top end.
Again, ask Gijs.I asked the whats happening now questions on the original post as well, should have scrolled down a bit further before posting, but the question remains, whats happening now?
CLEM
financed by an industrial from Asiago and developed by an engineering firm who designed the AR F1 engines. In Pesaro someone proposed to buy the design to restart building motorcycles again to be designed at I.DE.AI have seen the original water cooled four valve trile engine and it was not the same (looking) as the benelli, There was a story circulating a while ago wich (on one side0 may have come from Piero, that the designers of the w/c triple stole it from Moto Laverda, then another (from the other side) that those designers were not paid by Moto laverda, so took it away with them in lieu of money, and as Paul said M amd P's sisters wanted their money out of the company.
financed by an industrial from Asiago and developed by an engineering firm who designed the AR F1 engines. In Pesaro someone proposed to buy the design to restart building motorcycles again to be designed at I.DE.A