Hmm ... Looks like a nice wheel build for an original restoration. But if it's a bike that's going to be clocking up lotsa miles, I wouldn't be happy with it.
The spokes don't fit the profile of the hub. There's a big gap between the outer spokes and the hub where the bend in the spoke is. You can see quite a bit of daylight under the spokes at that point. The hook in the end of the spokes need to be tighter so the spoke shafts lie flat against the hub flange, then bend around the outer edge of the flange to meet the rim.
The wheel builder has used straight outer spokes whereas they should have two bends, one where it hooks through the hole and another slight bend at the outer edge of the hub flange.
Wheel spokes are cyclically loaded and unloaded as the wheel rotates. That long hook in the hub end will flex a small amount with every loading cycle. In engineering terms, that little hook end is loaded as a cantilever beam. Imagine replacing the spoke with a piece of string and pulling it tight. That's the shape the wire spoke should be so it's loaded in tension rather than bending. If the bike is only ridden occasionally it'll probably be fine. But if you're going to ride it around Australia, I wouldn't be surprised if you get a few fatigue failures of the spokes at that point.
The Laverda factory made the same mistake, which is why the 3C's and SF's regularly break spokes in the rear wheel (haven't seen it happen on drummer front wheels). They nearly always break due to fatigue failure at the hook where it goes through the hub flange. I'm guessing those spokes are reproductions of the originals. Perfect for rivet counter original restorations, but not so good for long term reliability.