G
Grant
Guest
How about another pair of Pantah forks?
Sounds like yours are suss.
Sounds like yours are suss.
Get off your high horse Tippie. It wasn't a go at people on the forum, just stating a different point of view. I personally believe that updating a bike is fine, emulators, shocks, ignition, tyres etc., done it myself but I reckon there is a limit to how much a bike should be changed from how it left the factory. On the other hand I am amazed by the lengths some take to keep their bike(s) totally original.This post is for people who want their original bikes updated to as good as they can get within the prettywell original framework.
Anyone could come on here and criticize all the work people do with engines and tuning and make the same comment "why don?t you just buy a modern bike". It is what we do.
High horse? I think Tippie's was also just an opinion ... just sayin'Legs said:Just an opinion![]()
Grant said:How about another pair of Pantah forks?
Sounds like yours are suss.
Hate to rain on your party, Vince, but the gearing might affect top end in high gears, but if it won't produce power at revs in any gear it's nothing to do with the gearing! I fitted a one tooth bigger gearbox sprocket to that little 250 I rode to Sydney last year - still flies at revs in every gear, just a bit sluggish in 6th up a hill (below 8,000rpm!)Vince said:The pain continues, I discovered why this Pantah seems to have no top end power, someone reduced the rear sprocket from a 40 to a 38.
Dellortoman said:Telling them what side the chain is on is expecting them to work out the rotation direction themselves. Seems to be beyond some of the tyre fitters to do that. :![]()
So you obviously know about the dot that indicates where the valve aligns (to aid balancing), Jim?helicopterjim said:I have my own tire machine ......