Merc duplex primary chain for SF2 engine

LaverdaSoren

New member
Location
Nora Sweden
I am building an engine for my caféracer twin and are looking for the 'big pin' IWIS G67HP version (3/8" x 1/4") “bush” type chain.
When I search on the net I can not find the IWIS chain from an european dealer!!! Can someone Please give me advice how to find the IWIS chain?
I have found a chain called SWAG 99 11 0376 with the size G67HP - does anybody know the level of quality for the SWAG chains?
I have also found a FEBI Bilstein 25207 chain but the size is described as D67ZN. (?)

And as I have new primary sprockets I guess the best position to mount the duplex chain is on the two inner cogs closest to the crankcase?
 
If there is an option to use a duplex why would you use a heavier triplex? also I find the IWIS way more fluid than previous triplex I used many years ago. There was probably a good reason Laverda stopped the triplex in favor of 2 single rows
In case someone opens up the primary case and finds that the rivets are non genuine. No way I would trust any triplex again after breaking two of them. I have gone to two singles.
 
Apparently, the better test was Steve Bs and before that Chris Cuttlers extremely powerful Championship winning Twin that regularly broke Primary Chains and was doing his head in looking for a fix till Andy's chain did exactly that. It had something to do with the way it delivered its power. It convinced me how good that Chain is. I got one very early after that.
 
Apparently, the better test was Steve Bs and before that Chris Cuttlers extremely powerful Championship winning Twin that regularly broke Primary Chains and was doing his head in looking for a fix till Andy's chain did exactly that. It had something to do with the way it delivered its power. It convinced me how good that Chain is. I got one very early after that.
A multi cylinder is easier on transmissions, and tyres, than a twin, and I imagine that a 180 or 270° twin is easier than a 360° The worst is a single. It depends on how the power pulses are metered out. Power itself might even be secondary.
Paul
 
A multi cylinder is easier on transmissions, and tyres, than a twin, and I imagine that a 180 or 270° twin is easier than a 360° The worst is a single. It depends on how the power pulses are metered out. Power itself might even be secondary.
Paul
180 and 270 twins are harder on chains than a 360 twin. Both 180 and 270 twins have power strokes close together then a long pause till it happens again. 360 twin is at least evenly spaced.
If the tooth numbers on the primary are selected caerefully you can have what's called a humting tooth. Ie the power strokes never happen on the same tooth twice running. Evens out chain and sprocket wear. i think most Morse chain applications use this.
 
buy a Triplex for a Norton Commando, and shorten it. One third the cost of anything else and you can choose between, Regina or Reynold.
CLEM
Back when Andy chain was around, he said to avoid anything made by Renold unless the box said "Made in England". If it does not say this you are getting a cheap industrial chain that won't last. He recommend for triplex chain, Regina and for duplex or simplex chains, IWIS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob
For the record.
The Chain Man had it ok, but I was uncertain if the delivery would be with the Swedish Post Nord. I have had a number of problems with that company, especially when something has been sent from outside the EU.
In the end I got the IWIS chain from FEBI Bilstein. It came as a rivetted chain for some car so I took away a few links and used a rivet connecting link that they supplied.
 
Back
Top