laverdakeith said:
Not too difficult to explain Pat, the original alternator can not provide the required charging current. Had a bit of a look at this today, the charging requirements are clearly written in the instructions so I suppose the onus is on the end user to check for suitability. That's not a problem with the battery its a problem with the bike. They are tick tock on the later three phase bikes. It is a shame as they are a very good product, the wholesaler I buy them from is also aware of fake Chinky copies circulating.
Keith.
Well at least that's cleared that up then Keith, if you've got the earlier triples then an oddysey battery is a waste of cash.
Hi Keith,
I'm not positive as to the actual cause yet but, In consumer law the onus is not on the purchaser the onus is on the supplier to supply a product which is fit for purpose.My requirement in the contract was to pay the money over ...which I did... I didn't contact the sellers and ask for an Odyssey..They contacted me with an email flyer and then recommended the PC680 for my model bike. If it transpires that my bike is is fact operating correctly but there is some in-compatibility with the Odyssey then the onus is on them not moi !
If my bike is causing a power spike through a fault of some sort than that's different.
but,......
Point of interest..I spoke to two battery suppliers today/yesterday each with over 30 years in the battery trade. They had never heard of a new battery cutting whilst a vehicle was on the move and stopping the ignition from working . Once I had a complete alternator failure on an old car with an old battery..The lights just got dimmer and dimmer ..even with complete failure of the charging system the car didn't stop dead.
Whether there is a fault with my bike or not..I am not keen to be fitting a battery which could potentially leave a rider in a heap at the roadside very, very easily.
atb
joe