arancia
Senior member
- Location
- Arizona, USA
I'm taking a side track from the discussion about relining at "relining thread"
While the SF2 with its 2 front disks is imho a huge step up from the drums on the SF and GTL, I do like to ride the SF and GTL and am looking to get the best out of their "brakes" (aka "gentle retarders").
I did a recent long trip on my GTL after doing the best I could to get the existing brake shoe contact points balanced (same as late SF and the rear on SF2 and 3C) with a friend on his significantly updated Norton Commando, a replica of the 76 prototype as in the Birmingham museum, with cast wheels, 3 disks, etc - all the improvements that would have been possible if Norton management had decided they really wanted to compete. There were several occasions on that trip where I was following where he decided to turn at a junction and I just went sailing though the junction - no way to slow at his deceleration rate!!
Reflecting that I was lucky that road situations did not need a real emergency stop and accepting now that it's time to optimize those brakes before such an event occurs, I'm planning a full renovation of the GTL's 2 late Laverda drums.
I'm interested to see that in Andy Wagner's book, he suggests that we should return to the circlip retained shoe linkages (instead of split pins) and the heavier shoe-to-shoe springs instead of the later weaker springs from shoes to backplate - in effect returning to the the early series SuperFreni internals instead of the later setup.
Looks like this requires only the 4 pins with circlip grooves, 4 circlips, and a pair of springs. When looking at the investment in shoe relining and arcing to drum that seems a minor additional expense so I'm asking is everyone doing this with their later drum brakes - experiences?
Any other thoughts on getting the best out of the second series SF brakes?
While the SF2 with its 2 front disks is imho a huge step up from the drums on the SF and GTL, I do like to ride the SF and GTL and am looking to get the best out of their "brakes" (aka "gentle retarders").
I did a recent long trip on my GTL after doing the best I could to get the existing brake shoe contact points balanced (same as late SF and the rear on SF2 and 3C) with a friend on his significantly updated Norton Commando, a replica of the 76 prototype as in the Birmingham museum, with cast wheels, 3 disks, etc - all the improvements that would have been possible if Norton management had decided they really wanted to compete. There were several occasions on that trip where I was following where he decided to turn at a junction and I just went sailing though the junction - no way to slow at his deceleration rate!!
Reflecting that I was lucky that road situations did not need a real emergency stop and accepting now that it's time to optimize those brakes before such an event occurs, I'm planning a full renovation of the GTL's 2 late Laverda drums.
I'm interested to see that in Andy Wagner's book, he suggests that we should return to the circlip retained shoe linkages (instead of split pins) and the heavier shoe-to-shoe springs instead of the later weaker springs from shoes to backplate - in effect returning to the the early series SuperFreni internals instead of the later setup.
Looks like this requires only the 4 pins with circlip grooves, 4 circlips, and a pair of springs. When looking at the investment in shoe relining and arcing to drum that seems a minor additional expense so I'm asking is everyone doing this with their later drum brakes - experiences?
Any other thoughts on getting the best out of the second series SF brakes?