geoffr
New member
- Location
- sheffield England
Grant is spot on the Laverdas were still great bikes into the late seventies, but 79 was a very bad year followed up by poor development. Their reputation suffered badly, I had a 1200 my friend a Monty both great bikes to ride much better then mates CB900/GS1000 CB750,s to ride and everyone loved them even at the extra cost, but there was one big issue that cropped up whenever we went on a decent ride one of the Laverdas woulds strike problems ( the Monty was slightly worse than my 1200 ) to the point where it became a bit of a joke and we both soon gave up on the Lavs. 79 Lavs have a lot to answer for. The basic bikes could have easily been updated to match the early 80's japs and had they been reliable would have sold ok but he RGS wasn't quite good enough in the handling or performance dept it could have been what Triumph made later no problem but as Grant said development resources were wasted on dead end projects instead of improving what was basically a good bike.
GPZ900's were a step ahead of the air cooled bikes but it didn't take rocket science to equal one (the last 20mph took a very long time to arrive) if anything i would say the GPZ1100 Unitrack killed Laverdas for good, massively faster and better handling everywhere.
GPZ900's were a step ahead of the air cooled bikes but it didn't take rocket science to equal one (the last 20mph took a very long time to arrive) if anything i would say the GPZ1100 Unitrack killed Laverdas for good, massively faster and better handling everywhere.