The Aussie depository.....

RIP Barry Davis.

Bombers and Kangaroos VFL star that also happened to be my PE teacher at Oak Park High.

piet
It’s a shame he didn’t coach South Melbourne….. he had one of those 1/4 time coaches stares that meant business.

Rather like Gorbachev had after saying to Reagan “Don’t fuck with me Ronnie”
 
Two Bombers names that I've never forgotten - Jack Clark (brother of fast miler Ron, I believe) and Barry Davis. Let's hope the team continue to play well to the end of the season and honour Barry! Even thinking of going to the G tonight to see if we can up our percentage against the poor old Tiges.
 
hello all

I am seeking the following for my RGS project - trying in Australia to begin.........

Part No 61 922 531 Instrument Pod (18)
Part No 61 923 513 OR 549 Glazing, fairing, Europa OR USA (19)
Part No 58 020 203 Cap, fuel filler, (FAAB) (22)

as shown on the attached
any suggestions regarding sources will be appreciated

Hopefully, I won't need to sell a kidney
 

Attachments

Absolutely nothing to do with Laverdas or Australian sport, but a heads-up for Aussie pet owners, of which there are probably heaps on this forum.

The pet microchip registry Home Safe ID appears to no longer be supporting its database, so may be shutting down. It's not really clear what's going on but it seems closure of the database is imminent. If that happens, a search of your animal's microchip number will not be able to find anything.

If you have a pet who's microchip number is registered with Home Safe ID, I'd suggest you register the number and ID info on another database. The microchip itself doesn't need to be replaced. The number just needs to be on an accessible database.

Central Animal Records seems to be a pretty safe bet as it's the largest pet database in Australia. They're aware of the issue and have a page to guide you through the process of registering your pet's data.

If you don't know your pet's microchip ID number, or which registry holds the data, you can find the number on a vaccination certificate. It may also be shown a vet's invoice. Once you've got the number, do a search on PET ADDRESS https://petaddress.com.au/ and it'll tell you which database it's on. The Pet Address search is still accessing Home Safe ID data at present, but probably not for much longer.

If you can't find the number anywhere, you may need to get your vet to scan it, which will most likely cost you a vet consultation fee. If it turns out to be on the dud database, they can register it on another database for you.

Cheers,
Cam
 
Absolutely nothing to do with Laverdas or Australian sport, but a heads-up for Aussie pet owners, of which there are probably heaps on this forum.

The pet microchip registry Home Safe ID appears to no longer be supporting its database, so may be shutting down. It's not really clear what's going on but it seems closure of the database is imminent. If that happens, a search of your animal's microchip number will not be able to find anything.

If you have a pet who's microchip number is registered with Home Safe ID, I'd suggest you register the number and ID info on another database. The microchip itself doesn't need to be replaced. The number just needs to be on an accessible database.

Central Animal Records seems to be a pretty safe bet as it's the largest pet database in Australia. They're aware of the issue and have a page to guide you through the process of registering your pet's data.

If you don't know your pet's microchip ID number, or which registry holds the data, you can find the number on a vaccination certificate. It may also be shown a vet's invoice. Once you've got the number, do a search on PET ADDRESS https://petaddress.com.au/ and it'll tell you which database it's on. The Pet Address search is still accessing Home Safe ID data at present, but probably not for much longer.

If you can't find the number anywhere, you may need to get your vet to scan it, which will most likely cost you a vet consultation fee. If it turns out to be on the dud database, they can register it on another database for you.

Cheers,
Cam
Thanks Cam, one of our recent rescue cats is on that register. Will look at changing that. 👍
 
Today be election day. It’s held every three years.

I liken election day voting to my marriage:
I have my say every once in a while, but it makes very little difference to the final outcome.
 
Today be election day. It’s held every three years.

I liken election day voting to my marriage:
I have my say every once in a while, but it makes very little difference to the final outcome.
“Now darling, you know that’s not true. Now put those beige trousers on, yes the ones I bought you, and drive me to the cafe”
 
hello all
I am seeking the following for my RGS project - trying in Australia to begin.........
Part No 58 020 203 Cap, fuel filler, (FAAB) (22)
While in general I don't frequent the "Aussie Depository", I saw your post and empathize with the challenge of finding parts and their cost.

There is RGS locking fuel cap in here:

or take a look here
RGS fuel cap
 
When I first heard about it, I considered going. love a good countdown, and I doubt I will see a US launch anytime soon. But emigrating to Queensland with all the delays. Naa, Famous quote, Space is hard.
 
Ok, so now I read that the launch was considered a success because all they wanted to do was get the thing off the pad!
After all it was an old rocket that had been sitting around for 18mths!!
So they are happy with 14seconds in the air, something like, at first attempt "they all do that sir"
What I don't understand is, it appears that any newcomer mustn't be able to use existing technology that has launched heaps of rockets, they develop their own and apparently just see if it works......:unsure:
Anyway, beyond my paygrade to understand this stuff, I just remember being hooked on the grainy vision of the moon landing in '69............
(Oh, no, hope I haven't prompted those conspiracy theories to come out - Trumpy didn't have anything to do with it did he? :LOL:)
 
There is plenty of room for new tech in fuels and materials. There are even 3D printing vehicles. To see the mass production happening at Space x is impressive. Anything is better than what NASA is doing, one launch of their proposed big rocket every 2 years, using up obsolete old Space Shuttle engines hamstrung by outdated Government Policy against SpaceX, with 25 launches approved for their very big rocket yearly, and a bunch already built to go. Hopefully, less will rapidly disassemble. Notice I haven't mentioned himself, best separate HIM from the rocket
 
Containing near destructive explosions using near freezing point fuels under huge pressures being pumped and mixed at mind-boggling rates, producing heat that is bearly contained, is far from easy. One of SpaceX's first big rocket launches just about blew their launch site to bits, and that went well. They mis-calculated the pressure and heat. The old Moon rockets used a Flame trench under the pad to divert this energy, plus a water deluge system, that got retrofitted to Pad 1. Pad 2 is almost finished, gets both, plus the new pad they're building at the Cape also gets both. Their goal is to launch, return for both ship and booster to be caught and then a relaunch in days.
 
Back
Top