Hi all,
If you look closely you will see that the port floor has been raised up quite a lot,
Also because the valve seat has been dropped into the new chamber by about 4mm, this has the effect of raising the floor even more, thus allowing a quite nice (but not yet perfect) short side radius, far better than original and far better than I think you could get without doing something similar.
Lay a standard port over mine and match the valve seat positions, you will then see how high my port is compared to standard.
I have seen what others do and do pay attention, however, "I do what I do" only my results matter to me. I have worked very many years on a Superflow SF600 and have a fair idea of what works and what does not, and am actually on the hunt for another one. This combustion chamber and port shape etc absolutely has worked for me in the past on several winning race engines so am relatively sure it will not be a failure, however, as mentioned, "the bulshit stops when the flag drops"
The standard head does flow fairly well but absolutely not as good as it can do. Believe me, that inlet port will not get me the power I am shooting for.
Exhaust, of course this will be a one off, just for my engine and as much work will go on here also, calcs have already been made for a base design but real world dyno testing will be the final word. This engine will be right when it hits the track.
Spring seat, there is enough room, let me worry about that.
Thanks for the interest,
PS. 44mm inlets and 38mm exhaust, however I may go down to 37mm exhausts,
Regards,
J