phil37 said:
Not true - but thanks Simon - just trying to point out that many Laverda owners aren't able to, or can't justify, spending unlimited amounts on their bikes. - Regards - Phil
Point taken! But there are pro's and con's to be considered and cost is one of them.
I have noticed that many modern bikes have a cable operated clutch, I thought that was because of saving money perhaps or some other reason? But it seems that some manufacurers are are going back to hydraulic.
So in the plus column for hydraulic:
1). Hydraulic clutches are self-adjusting - as such the bite point should always be the same
2). It is comparitively easy to change ratios to make effort easier (fit 13mm master cylinder)
3). No lubrication required
In the minus column for hydraulic:
1). More expensive
2). Needs periodic replenishment of fluids
3). Offroad bikes can damage hydraulic equipment easily
4). In general cable can have a better 'feel' (subjective of course)
5). Superior Teflon coated cables have eliminated binding for the most part.
6). fluid leaks mark paintwork
7). Cables are easier to change (but of course it shouldn't bloody snap in the first place with regular maintenance/replacement)
I will be fitting a 13mm clutch master cylinder soon!
After 56 years of reliable operation my left hand now can't take sustained periods of clutch pulling without a lot of pain.