?hlins Shocks for Triple

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grant
  • Start date Start date
Grant,
I agree with you about the Maxton piggies..pig ugly :D  The Wilburs I have  have black springs and  look  fab to my eyes at least.. I think they are too good for me and the bike really...am thinking of junking them and getting back to funtimes with the nice Stradas Wolfgang reconditioned for me, wondering if I will make it round the next bumpy corner (why these track tyes are so fussy is beyond me, nice smooth suurfaces, total predictability compared to the roads..that'll get 'em going? >:D0
nick7
 
Got a set of Stradas on the Le Mans 3. Look great but so stiff I reckon a piece of reo bar would give a softer ride. Mind you it holds in the windy bits like glue, just my back is stuffed after a days hard ride.
 
Laverdalothar said:
Yogi said:
Lothar having used YSS and also Ohlins/Wilber, yet preferring the YSS overall seems a good comparison recommendation to me.  My second choice would have been to go for Maxton...

Yogi

Not that I am an expert, but for what I use them, I can't find enough reason to spend a 50% premium for Wilber's or almost 100% with ?hlins. But each to his own... Especially on the standard swing arm and rims setup you won't find enough reason to argue this price...

Grant: for the look of it: take the ones without piggyback and they look like Konis (but work way better...) while the Wilber's with blue springs or the golden ?hlins just look weird for me on a classic bike...

Dont want to argue but you can chose spring color by Wilbers ( mine are black) even those red and blue parts on pigyback are blank aluminium , so they fit on classic bike . all you have to do is to place order right .
 
Hi Romeo,

well - yeah, you can order it like you want or re-coat the springs or... But if you order standard items, they come with blue springs on them. Guess how I know...  ;)

Again - this is almost as religious of a discussion as what oil to take or if oil additives are any good. Not that I want this thread to turn into an oil thread...  :D
 
Grant said:
What about a carbon fibre bike, with very little standard stuff on it?

I would - just for the fun of it... - in that case get the springs hydrophraphed to a carbone look...:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=EvabvsW8zUE[/youtube]
 
Laverdalothar said:
Hi Romeo,

well - yeah, you can order it like you want or re-coat the springs or... But if you order standard items, they come with blue springs on them. Guess how I know...  ;)

Again - this is almost as religious of a discussion as what oil to take or if oil additives are any good. Not that I want this thread to turn into an oil thread...  :D

To late Lothar.

What's the best oil to have in your shocks? :D :D
                                                                  Dave
 
one of our customers recently had his bike rebuilt in Sydney at "?>>{$$%#@ Garage, bike is an 81 Jota
he has moved north to the Brisbane area so finally got to see the bike
this Sydney shop sold him a set of custom made Racetech piggyback shocks made specifically for his riding style, bike weight, etc, $2,500 for the pair
they made the shocks 350mm long
bike handles like a pig apparently, he installed the original Marzocchi units back on at our suggestion and bike was a lot better
is sitting like a chopper with those short shocks

have to admit though, for pure bling, those Racetech units are flash as, even compared to the top shelf Wilburs on my own 81 Jota
 
Red maybe its posible for Terry Hays,Shock Treatment in Sydney,Race Tech distributer to rebuild them with longer bits.I would expect the bodys to be all the same,he is easy to deal with on the phone.Its funny how many instant Laverda expert shops suddenly appear.Clange,just had a thought.Are the shocks adjustable for length,some can wind out 20 or 30mm.
 
Just a thought but what about 'NITRON' as a serious UK source that is seen as an alternative by many to ohlins (and better pricing?)  Daresay they probably have never seen a Lav triple before but they make their name producing customised kit and a loT of it is getting into BSB so can't be bad.
 
Seems like a bit of an oil thread.  Lots of differing opinions, and direct comparisons are hard to make.  The debate is also skewed by the different priorities (looks, bling, brand cachet, # of clicks, perceived 'quality' etc) of different customers and importantly the sometimes radically different asking prices in various markets.

YSS seem overpriced for what they are.   My pick is the non-reservoir Maxtons. They may not win a "mine's got more adjustments than yours" competition, but the thing is they don't need it because they're made just for you by experts in their field.  In my opinion they're also beautiful in an understated way, and at 400 quid represent superb value.

YMMV!!  :-)

Cheers
Steve B

 
breganzane said:
Seems like a bit of an oil thread.  Lots of differing opinions, and direct comparisons are hard to make.  The debate is also skewed by the different priorities (looks, bling, brand cachet, # of clicks, perceived 'quality' etc) of different customers and importantly the sometimes radically different asking prices in various markets.

YSS seem overpriced for what they are.   My pick is the non-reservoir Maxtons. They may not win a "mine's got more adjustments than yours" competition, but the thing is they don't need it because they're made just for you by experts in their field.  In my opinion they're also beautiful in an understated way, and at 400 quid represent superb value.

YMMV!!  :-)

Cheers
Steve B
AHH what would you know  :P
 
I had a set of ?hlins piggyback made up for my sfc1000. It have longer shocks by standard, so the Konis that it came with are too short like on all other RGS series frames, and make it handle less attractive. So, I had mine made to 385mm length (if I remember correctly), and tried a few sets of springs before settlening with some that is not too hard, not too soft. They fit the bike apart from a little interferrence with the chain guard, but more or less solved. The quality of assemblemce and manufacture is very good, and the looks department I like too. But I chose them for the quality of how they work. They simply are very good in my humble view. They suck up what they should, while being firm, and they keep the rear wheel planted, unlike a simple damper like Koni. Remember how many modern bike riders who complain over bad suspension on their plastic rocket with lots of knobs and gizmos? They also get ?hlins etc, because they work.
Another thing is I had them them changed for an extra length option, so I can adjust length without affecting travel, hardness, rebound etc. It sits in the bottom og the shock and can't be seen on the pics, as I took them before having that option done afterwards. It's a blue nut and a thread.
Overall I am very satisfied, and would buy them again.
Btw I was looking all over for prices, and it happened so, that the Danish importer Finn Ingeman was by far the cheapest, and made them to my spec.
Just my two-pence.
Cheers,
Jacques.
 

Attachments

  • a.JPG
    a.JPG
    129.1 KB · Views: 26
  • b.JPG
    b.JPG
    181.9 KB · Views: 38
  • c.JPG
    c.JPG
    120.8 KB · Views: 33
breganzane said:
YSS seem overpriced for what they are.  
Cheers
Steve B

Hi Steve,

I respect your technical knowledge, so could you highlight a bit why you think they are? For me with my limited rider skills, there is no obvious difference in functionality between the YSS and similar Wilbers or ?hlins (all without piggyback). The technology inside is the same (oil/gas with a separating piston) and they even offer length adjustment for free. If you compare these with the accordingly equipped Wilbers or ?hlins, you'll have to pay 50% more at least. I run them on my 1200 Jota since 5 years or so now, have done roughly 6.000 completely error free Km on them (which is not much, I agree...), some of which have been on the race track some on the road, all faultless. I also see no advantage in shocks that are "tailored to you", as for 90% of us Laverdisti, riding weight changes over time - be it that we lose or gain weight, be it different load or riding alone or with a passanger, with luggage or without etc. etc. So - where is the benefit if you have to adjust the dampers anyway to the different situation?

Again - I am not trying to teach you something (how could I  ::) ), I just like to understand where you see the value for money on a damper that does the same for 90% of us Laverdist as a 50 or even 100% more expensive Wilbers/?hlins one, please? Especially if you ride the quite soft and flexing original swing arms (especially on the 1000 SFC...), please?

I had a short discussion with AndreG at our meeting last weekend. He bought the YSS after I recommended them and was not to happy first, as he felt pain in his back after a longer ride. He changed the springs to softer ones with no satisfying effect. I think he has the original ones now back on the bike and rode to our meeting last saturday (roughly 400Km I would say, all country roads with some exceptions). He had no pain whatsoever and was quite happy with them. I remember well that he had the most expensive ?hlins laying on the  shelve for years as he wasn't to happy with them, too. After fiddling a bit with them and riding them for longer time, he got used to them and liked them quite much, too. But I don't think the difference between the standard YSS (roughly 450?) and the top equiped ?hlins (roughly 1.500?) are really worth the 1.100? difference to be honest, at least not for road use.

So - if you pay 1.100? less and have almost the same effect - isn't that the better value for money, even if they would (!!) give up twice as fast as the ?hlins?
 
Hey Grant

Seems to me you have restored a number of almost rivet perfect Lavs plus an evolution of the standard Lav concept in POP and you are now looking to build a top spec special.
Would the next evolution for a special be one with an after market frame ? You could then really benefit from such high tech suspension, brakes etc. etc......... Plan a budget then treble it .......... ;)

                                  Cheers
                                          Matt
 
Laverdalothar said:
could you highlight a bit why you think they are?

Firstly I *perceive* that the quality is not always perfect because out of the few people I know who have tried them, two have leaked oil.  Thomas had a set which leaked oil while still in the box, and one of the shocks on Crispin's Spaceframe would leak oil if you backed the compression clicker all the way out - either a stop was missing or not functioning, or some machining error in the needle valve assembly.  Just two examples, but two out of less than 10 people I know who have them, so enough to make me wonder.

Secondly ignoring any question over quality, they are mass produced.  The same damper internals are (as I understand it) used for every application of a certain shock, the only thing that tailors the shock to Laverda is the length, spring weight and end-eye sizes.  Hence the requirement for so many clicks as they have to allow for a large range of adjustment to suit very different bikes.  A custom made damping system only needs to allow say 10-15% range either side of a calculated ideal based on bike data, so 10 clicks on one shock might give you a lot more control than 40 clicks on another.

Thirdly is simply an emotional thing, I look at YSS and they are all very nice and pretty, but you can tell they are made in large volumes.  To me a Maxton shock is infinitely more satisfying, because I know they were made in a little factory containing a dozen people at most, and it is obvious to look at them that they are made in (comparatively) small volumes.  When I want to know something I pick up the phone (timezone dependant) and simply talk to the guy who runs the whole company - and he's not some shark of a financial wheeler and dealer, or some dickhead middle manager or inept local distributor - he's a guy who's been building racing motorcycle suspension for decades and has built a small niche company out of it.  This is especially meaningful to me, being a person who makes things out of metal for a living.  I see someone making a good business with a superb quality product at a very reasonable price, not succumbing to the greedy allure of manufacturing offshore, happy to keep it small and high quality.  I love that.  It's a karma thing.

I alluded to all this in my earlier post, there is a lot more to this subject than just the quantifiable.  The topic is skewed by various different factors, the last being the pricing in each different market.  In Australia both the non-reservoir and piggyback YSS are MORE EXPENSIVE than Maxton.  Hence, while they are generally a very good product (and for most users could not be told apart from other more expensive products in a blind test!), I find them "overpriced for what they are".

As I also said in my post - YMMV!!!!  :-)

Cheers
Steve B






 
Matt, can't say my restorations are rivet-perfect, just as good as I can make them.
It is easier, if more expensive, to take a wreck and return it to standard, as you have a reference to work to.
Specials, like POP, are supposedly cheaper but much harder to finish, as there is always something else to try, and it is usually a one-off.

I have to say that making POP was the most satisfying (even if it is still only 99% completed) job, although I do get a buzz when a standard one is finished. The Jarama will be next to be finished, followed by the green Mirage. Both will be up for sale. I just have had to take a few weeks out to deal with a more pressing matter.
I have often thought about basing a project on a special frame, but I went off it after the hassles a friend had making a Harris Laverda some years ago. The factory spaceframe is aesthetically challenged (to me) and I can't think of anyone else still making new special frames for them.

The carbon bike will be fun too, I think, once I get round to it. I have noted down all the comments about shocks in this thread and may end up with Maxtons. They'll be doing the forks anyway.
 
Back
Top