Thank you, I am sure the frame numbers didn't go this high but I have checked the frame number and 28120 is definitly the number showing.First of all, i do not think they build so many 500's that a standard number range (starting at the usual 1000) would make up for 27.120 model 500 being sold. i may well be wrong though. I would assume there is a typo in the frame number and it is maybe 2812 instead of 28120.
then the next thing is an obvious and most likely one: the engine has been exchanged due to a major failure of the original one.
definetely not a laverda frame number and if a replacement frame had been supplied, there would only be enough space for the four digits that it will have, between the stars, they would have been blank, the number should be LAV.500*????* with number digits between the stars. Engine numbers on 500's that have been changed are usually easy to spot, the number is on a sqaure sunken section of casting, it would be more difficult to change because of the ridge that is all around the number, they get changed on other Lavs as well, and are more easy to do, but usually you can still spot because of the unusual font that Laverda used on some of the digits, not saying publicly which ones.
CLEM
Yes. A replacement frame. LAV, DGM, and the stars are ex factory.Not a factory stamping. The number, that is. Looks like a replacement frame, the stars seem genuine.
Jawohl. Sicher.... should a original LAVERDA 500 have matching numbers or not?
Ciao, Gert
Yes and no! I can find no evidence of an engine # outside or indeed inside my '61 200cc Bicilindrico, or the completely renovated engine that I bought from Cor Dees. The frame #0195 was very difficult to find!The mess with the non-matching numbers I think only appeared on the Zane-Bikes. All other Laverdas (at least with laverda built engines) built until the first closing of the company should have matching numbers afaik.