Thanks for your message RobHi. If I've understood you correctly, this contradicts quite strongly what I researched and worked toward on late model triple cylinder head/s.
Do you have a report on your findings?
Are you suggesting that the alloy used on late triple heads was of a non heat treatable formulation, if do, what alloy?
None of this fits with my findings and work ?
Rob
Very interesting. I can say that my material analysis was done quickly with limited equipment and knowledge, especially the knowledge for this purpose. I used XRF equipment with settings that can detect Magnesium and heavier elements, settings especially for light alloy metals. The analysis was taken from a straight machined surface that was lightly sanded with 400 grit paper and wiped clean with alcohol rag, two different locations.
With this kind of testing even a small reason can cause a wrong result and wrong conclusions. Always need to know the limitations of the method. To my understanding this method should well find the elements, but there is some limitations for example if the material is not exactly the same at the surface and deeper. I'm not a metallurgist and therefore I don't probably know what to look at.
Found the result sheet, I post the data below from these two measurements, there isn't any more results:
First measurement:
Al 85.92 w-%
Si 13.64 w-%
S 0.03 w-%
Mn 0.18 w-%
Fe 0.23 w-%
Ni 0.01 w-%
Second measurement:
Al 85.79 w-%
Si 13.74 w-%
S 0.05 w-%
Mn 0.20 w-%
Fe 0.22 w-%
Ni 0.01 w-%
Can you find if there is something essential missing from this?
-Jouni