A Tale of Two Titties

When I was in my teens we visited an elderly aunt and uncle and were walking around town. They were very religious, you know, no drinking, smoking, dancing on Sundays, that type of thing!!
Anyway a pretty lady walks past and the old fella's gaze followed her longingly. His wife made some remark and he turned to me, winked and said if you can't look you might as well be dead!
If someone wants to combine an example of mechanical beauty with some natural curves in one photo who am I to argue ;)
 
chrisk said:
Thanks Nadia, I thought I was the only person left in this world that hasn’t conformed to the PCness we have to endure these days.

I got verbally slammed last week because I called an Indian bloke a towel-head. Frankly, the guy had a towel wrapped around his head.

If I really wanted to offend, I could have called him a black guy with a towel on his head…. I’m fucked if I know where it will end.
Click to expand...
Chris,
I was informed that there were two types of Indians, some with dots, some with feathers........ LOL!
 
I like pretty/elegant ladies, but the ones that model, pole dance, topless go go or strip etc have proven over the last sixty or so years (IMHO) to be useless at everything else including sex.
CLEM
 
Last edited:
motoddrob said:
Us to have this poster
Click to expand...
'You can't knock the roll', I still have the poster, I got it from the 'eyetie' in the fish n' chip shop next to the Kalamunda pub, a frequent Laverda pit stop. Can you say 'eyetie' these days?

Political Correctness is a curse here in the USA you have to be very careful of what you say and to whom. A few years back well before BLM raised its political agenda you could not call a person of the African American persuasion black. I was dragged into Human Resources for counseling along with reeducation after simply answering an inquiry about a nurse who I worked with I described her as "Natisha, the tall black nurse she'll be here tomorrow". Now in 2022, you cannot refer to someone as 'African American', we are back to black.

Labels conquer and divide.

'Tits' do sell:eek:
 
Last edited:
78jotadave said:
'You can't knock the roll', I still have the poster, I got it from the 'eyetie' in the fish n' chip shop next to the Kalamunda pub, a frequent Laverda pit stop. Can you say 'eyetie' these days?

Political Correctness is a curse here in the USA you have to be very careful of what you say and to whom. A few years back well before BLM raised its political agenda you could not call a person of the African American persuasion black. I was dragged into Human Resources for counseling along with reeducation after simply answering an inquiry about a nurse who I worked with I described her as "Natisha, the tall black nurse she'll be here tomorrow". Now in 2022, you cannot refer to someone as 'African American', we are back to black.

Labels conquer and divide.

'Tits' do sell:eek:
Click to expand...
Well, you can be correct and call them, kneebros......... LOL!
 
helicopterjim said:
Are we talking women again?

Jim
Click to expand...
And of course always worth having a full understanding of the rental terms.......................

One evening, after attending the theatre, two gentlemen were walking down the avenue when they observed a rather well dressed and attractive young lady walking ahead of them. One of them turned to the other and remarked, "I'd give $250 to spend the night with that woman."

Much to their surprise, the young lady overheard their remark, turned around, and replied, "I'll take you up on that offer."

She had a neat appearance and a pleasant voice, so after bidding his companion good night, the man accompanied the young lady to her apartment. The following morning, as he prepared to leave, the man gave her $125. She demanded the rest of the money, stating, "If you don't give me the other $125 I'll sue you for it."

He laughed, saying "I'd like to see you get it on these grounds." Within a few days, he was surprised when he received a summons ordering his presence in court as a defendant in a lawsuit. He hurried to his lawyer and explained the details of the case. His lawyer said, "She can't possibly get a judgement against you on such grounds, but it will be interesting to see how her case will be presented."

After the usual preliminaries, the lady's Lawyer addressed the court as follows:
"Your Honour, my client, this lady, is the owner of a piece of property, a garden spot, surrounded by a profuse growth of shrubbery, which property she agreed to rent to the defendant for a specified length of time for the sum of $250. The defendant took possession of the property, used it extensively for the purposes for which it was rented, but upon vacating the premises, he paid only $125, one-half of the amount agreed upon. The rent was not excessive, since it is restricted property, and we ask judgement be granted against the defendant to assure payment of the balance."

The defendant's Lawyer was not only surprised but also impressed AND amused by the way his opponent had presented the case. Naturally, his defence was somewhat different from the way he had originally planned to present it. He rose to the occasion!

'Your Honour," he said, "my client agrees that the lady has a fine piece of property, that he did rent such property for a time, and a degree of pleasure was derived from the transaction. However, my client found a well on the property around which he placed his own stones, sunk a shaft, and erected a pump, all labor performed personally by him. We claim these improvements to the property were sufficient to offset the unpaid amount, and that the plaintiff was adequately compensated for the rental of said property. We, therefore, ask that judgment not be granted."

The young lady's lawyer answered, "Your Honour, my client agrees that the defendant did find a well on her property. However, had the defendant not known that the well existed, he would never have rented the property. Also, upon vacating the premises, the defendant removed the stones, pulled out the shaft, and took the pump with him. In doing so, he not only dragged the equipment through the shrubbery, but left the hole much larger than it was prior to his occupancy, making the property much less desirable to others. We, therefore, ask that judgement be granted."

In the Judge's decision, he provided for two options: "Pay the balance $125 to the plaintiff, or have the equipment detached from its current location and provided to the plaintiff for damages."

The defendant wrote out a cheque immediately.
 
piranha-bro2 said:
Hobbsy's 3C and Sal! Nice one Dave.

Your memories of that bike are probably not all that pleasant.
Click to expand...
More 'good times' memories' than bad Q, only one incident, what can you say"shit happens". Hobbs' bike, we even had fun riding his 3c the 380+kms back from Waggrakine/Geraldton with a newly created hole in its center piston, a bit like riding an SF :) Picked up my 3C 130kms south of Geraldton and put a new rear tube in it and we were on our way. A little 'Pemberton poison':cool: made for a great ride home to Lesmurdie albeit slow with the modified 3cSF, it would cruise nicely at 70-80 mph but it would take forever to get up to speed, thankfully the road was long and straight, Ha, Cheers
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top