Visited my father a few days ago, long story to the bike of course, but the somewhat condensed one is that as this engine is a much later number than the original, it was swapped with the worn-out original. (back then a lot cheaper to buy a running Laverda than rebuilding an engine). Turned out however it had been opened before and the head had so much taken off (either by necessity or shoddy work, it was like that when my father put in the bike) which my father did not know. Gave it a full service then after a few weeks had holed pistons... It still had the sidecar back then.
Only then it appeared the head had so much taken off, after fixing it all up and consulting Gijs van Dijk he then special-orderd the 10s for this compression + side car & that has been like it ever since. It also has dual foot cilinder gaskets. My father agreed w/o the sidecar it would probably run well on 8 or 9s now. I wonder how old those plugs are -the sidecar has been sold ages ago!
My father+bike were featured in Moto'73 magazine a few years ago, they did a technical check and it turned out, after a lot of kilometers, the compression ratio was still 9:1. After a quick internet search, that appears to be more like my R90S, and an SF, than a GT.
Caveat is this is mostly parroting my dad though, as I was a little guy back then & work in healthcare IT, not a bike shop

Glad I can still ask him about it, brings up some nice memories for the both of us too.
for my own comprehension: I assume the compression ratio gets higher, because the head had so much taken off, it makes the combustion chamber smaller? Probably a lot more to it (shapes of head, pistons and what not?) though.